• EuG: No risk of confusion between Union trademarks (végé/VEGE STORY) for vegetarian meat substitutes, in GRUR Prax 2023, 592 *

• OLG Hamburg: Competitive protection for a seasonal product consisting of several liquor bottles, in: GRUR-Prax 2023, 464

• KG Berlin: No duty to provide information by a postal service provider when transporting a counterfeit SD card, in: GRUR-Prax 2023, 225 *

• OLG Hamburg: Perception of traffic when advertising a legal service offer with location indication, in: GRUR-Prax 2021, 421

• BGH: No expansion of the scope of protection when specifying claim characteristics, in: GRUR-Prax 2021, 143

• OLG Frankfurt: Misleading advertising with the production of an industrial product in Germany, in GRUR-Prax 2020, 492

• OLG Frankfurt: Competition violation by holding for passengers outside marked taxi stands, in GRUR-Prax 2020, 494

• EuG: No registration of a figurative mark related to cannabis consumption, in: GRUR-Prax 2020, 99

• OLG Frankfurt a.M.: Abusive action against unsolicited email advertising, in: GRUR-Prax 2019, 470

• BGH: Advertising with "Olympic-worthy" and "Olympic-ready" sportswear, in: GRUR-Prax 2019, 231

• BPatG: Grace period for use of an IR trademark with the mention of the EU, in: GRUR-Prax 2019, 182

• EuG: Phonetic similarity takes a backseat to predominantly visual perception of a product identifier, in: GRUR-Prax 2019, 37

• BPatG: Registrability of the word/figurative sign "Olympia", in: GRUR-Prax 2018, 467

• BPatG: "goRecht" registrable for legal services, in GRUR-Prax 2018, 380

• OLG Munich: "Bauernhofolympiade" does not violate § 3 II OlympSchG, in: GRUR-Prax 2018, 126

• EuG: No obstacle to registration concerning the Union word mark "OSHO", in: GRUR-Prax 2017, 528

• BPatG: The shape of a 3D stand-up pouch is solely determined by its technical function, in: GRUR-Prax 2017, 430

• LG Cologne: Trademark use of a figurative sign through 3D application, in GRUR-Prax 2017, 164

• EuGH: Procedural errors in the continuation of the opposition proceedings, in: GRUR-Prax 2016, 469

• EUG: Violation of the justification requirement in individual case decisions, in: GRUR-Prax 2016, 258

• OLG Schleswig: Change of cost decision in the annulment proceedings, in: GRUR-Prax 2016, 182

• BPatG: Lack of distinctiveness of the mark "Kommune 2.0", in: GRUR-Prax 2016, 36

• OLG Hamburg: No circumvention of the exclusion of cure according to § 49 I 3 MarkenG, in: GRUR-Prax 2015, 321

• Risk of confusion due to conceptual connection, in: GRUR-Prax 2015, 184

• Advertising with "Olympic prices" and "Olympic discount", commentary on BGH, I ZR 131/13 – Olympic discount in: K&R 1/2015, 46 ff.

• An individual component of a word/figurative mark can establish a collision, in: GRUR-Prax 2014, 479

• Commentary on BGH, advertising for third-party products, in: Kommunikation & Recht, Issue: 05/2014, 357 f.

• Origin indication of a shape mark, in: GRUR-Prax 2014, 107

• Advertising with "Olympic discount" and "Olympic prices", in: GRUR-Prax 2013, 381

• We are the people, in: Legal Tribune Online from 20.05.2013

• On the similarity of signs between word and figurative marks as well as three-dimensional designs, in: WRP Competition, in: Law and Practice 2013, 455 ff.

• Origin indication with increased distinctive character of a 3D mark, in: GRUR-PRAX 2013, 13

• Münchner Hofpfisterei warns bakeries – The brand Sonne, in: Legal Tribune Online from September 19, 2012

• The public prosecutor, your friend and helper, in: Börsen-Zeitung, August 10, 2011, p. 2

• Commentary on: Judgment OLG Frankfurt a. M. “Criminal liability for subscription trap website”, in: Kommunikation & Recht, 2011, 205

• Subsequent removal of the effects of a conclusion declaration, in: WRP Competition in Law and Practice 2009, 795

• Registrability despite elements designed in a typical advertising manner, in: GRUR-Prax 2014, 353

*with attorney Sophie Krämer